Attention: Confluence is not suitable for the storage of highly confidential data. Please ensure that any data classified as Highly Protected is stored using a more secure platform.
If you have any questions, please refer to the University's data classification guide or contact ict.askcyber@sydney.edu.au
Sprint 13 [Apple Pie]
Date | Mar 9, 2021 |
---|---|
Team | TAP Product Line |
Project Participants | @Brad Fernandes (Unlicensed) @Jules Levin @alexia nicholson (Unlicensed) @Rachel Forbes @john.humphreys @Monica Kluegel @Manpreet Sidhu @Sidra Zafar @Himanshu Raikar (Unlicensed) @The Ho Trang @Yeng Sembrano @AlainGasquet@Chanel Zheng @apirami.kumaradevan |
Background
Sprint 13 achievement are listed as -
Update permissions for the 'Active' flag on addresses and Phone numbers.
Enhancement to Campaign code creation.
Data conversion [Yeng]
7 of 15 tables completed (Pledges, Entity, etc.)
Addresses and emails data conversion testing completed
Data conversion [Sidra]
15 tables completed (Opportunities, Relationship management team, Wealth assets, etc.)
Outstanding (Tasks, Opportunity stages)
Created fields for Pledge reminder
Loaded Activity tasks related to Planned Giving/ Bequest (2018 to 2021)
Primary degree data fix
SITS migration to Tribal cloud (Test B environment) - Test integration with Jarvis
Data conversion [Manpreet]
Volunteer, Position, Category, Campaign, Campaign members, Education and Area of study
Enhancements to Donor receipts (Salutation)
Enhancements to iModules integration (Batch items)
User goals and KPIs loaded for 2021
Most reports converted from Advance to Jarvis
Sprint 13 was limited to 9 business days due to Advancement Services Team day (03/03). Additionally, there were no ICT integrations resources as they were re-directed to Curriculum Timetable (CT) and Workday projects.
Despite the time above constraints, the team closed out 95 tickets [50%] (Done + Cancelled).
Statistics at the end of Sprint
Retrospective
Conducted using IdeaBoardz to collaborate and gather feedback. Participants were given an opportunity to vote on the feedback for discussion.
What went well? | |
Point | Votes |
Consistent dedication to working through data conversion tickets/bugs | 4 |
Introduction of Sprint names | 1 |
Summary of testing objects with their pass/fail status. | 0 |
What can be improved? | |
Point | Votes |
focus on customer's experience and expectations in Jarvis | 2 |
consider grooming user stories as part of spring planning | 2 |
Tech team to work on 2 -3 tickets at one time | 1 |
Close out tasks that are 'In Test' or 'In Progress' | 1 |
Action Items | |
Point | Votes |
Develop a cadence on deployment for Integration and Configuration. Bug fixes can be deployed on Demand. | 1 |
Apex coding may be a blocker. Look at alternatives to help TAP business users manage different tasks | 1 |
Addresses/ emails with foreign characters need to be fixed - To be done by SAM in May | 0 |
determine up front what will or won't be achieved at sprint planning knowing that tech team will work on 2-3 tickets during the sprint | 0 |
Update Jira Service Desk portal with references to Jarvis (instead of Advance) | 0 |
Update Acceptance Criteria to When/ Why/ Who to provide better context | 0 |