/
TAP-211 Definition of Donor
  • Rough draft
  • Attention: Confluence is not suitable for the storage of highly confidential data. Please ensure that any data classified as Highly Protected is stored using a more secure platform.
    If you have any questions, please refer to the University's data classification guide or contact ict.askcyber@sydney.edu.au

    TAP-211 Definition of Donor

    Approval

    Approved

    Comments

    Approved

    Comments

    @jessica.wood

     

    @AlainGasquet

     

    @Yeng Sembrano

     

    @albie.roets

     

    @Monica Kluegel

     

     

     

    <insert>

     

    Reviewed

    Comments

    Reviewed

    Comments

    Based on my conversation with @jessica.wood


    The contact which receive soft credit need further investigation to understand if they are donor or not.

    contact receives a soft credit in different ways:

    1- They are like fundraisers they ask their friends to donate. They are not considered as donor in this case.

    2- They work for a company and their company donate money. They are not considered as donors.

    3- They have a found and they donate through their fund and use the receipt for tax purposes etc, in such a cases as they are the main decision maker they are considered as donor.

    to help ASR team to review these records, we can provide the list of the accounts and their types that originating gift comes from. for example for most of households, the related contacts are not donors.
    Additional notes, some of the donors cant be identified by Legal and GRC amount, these are the ones that are done by AQ conversion as part of the migration, to identify these ones description field need to be checked.

    There is also GRC records that need to be cleaned. needs further analysis and investigation.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    <insert>

     

    Household Accounts Contacts:

    • Household Contact awarded with Legal Credit Amount is a Donor (regardless if funds not received, caveat: AQ has issues with GRC for voided written off gifts which still shows legal credit)

    • Household Contact whose Account is awarded a soft credit is a Donor

    • Household Contact with NO legal credit and whose Account does NOT have any soft credit is NOT a Donor

    Organisation Accounts Contacts:

    • Organisation Contact awarded with Legal Credit Amount is NOT a Donor (TBC)? - why contacts would be directly linked to an Organisation instead of their household account? Contact should only be directly linked to an organisation if they don’t have their household account (TBC). When creating a batch gift for an Organisation, it is not possilbe to award legal credit. Therefore, these legal credits must have been adjusted at the gift after the batch has been closed (TBC).

    Example:

    Legal Credit has been given to a duplicate contact record which is linked to the organization instead of the one that is linked to household

    This image shows that the contact has been probably duplicated, not sure if it was intentional and why
    Legal Credit has been awarded to a contact who is directly connected to an organization, I think this should be avoided or explained why the intension is

    Some sample contacts to check out of 608 records

    AQB__DonorAccount__r.Name

    AQB__ContactId__c

    AQB__ContactId__r.Name

    AQB__DonorAccount__r.Name

    AQB__ContactId__c

    AQB__ContactId__r.Name

    R J & L M McKenzie Pty Limited

    0038v0000016zU0AAI

    R J McKenzie

    Estate of the Late Ellie Grace Smith

    0034a000007DK8DAAW

    Ellie Grace Smith

    iNova Pharmaceuticals (Aust) Pty Ltd

    0034a000007if6NAAQ

    Sir/ Madam14010

    Estate of the Late Kathleen Joan Laurence

    0034a000007EGHhAAO

    Kathleen Joan Laurence

    Estate of the late Arthur Ronald Brown

    0034a000007E7RZAA0

    Arthur Ronald Brown

    Miss Shirley Joan Atkinson

    0034a000007EeLgAAK

    Shirley Joan Atkinson

    Mr Francis Lord

    0034a000007G5UvAAK

    Gertrude Angel-Lord

    Estate Of The Late David Harold Tribe

    0034a000007EMaiAAG

    David Harold Tribe

    Mr David H Tribe

    0034a000007EMaiAAG

    David Harold Tribe

    Jilin Holdings Pty Ltd

    0038v0000016rRjAAI

    Louise Diamond

    Jilin Holdings Pty Ltd

    0038v0000016rReAAI

    Michael Diamond AM MBE

    Estate of the late Francis William Tunney

    0034a000007EGp3AAG

    Frank W Tunney

    • Organisation Contact with Soft Credit on their Account I think should not be a donor (TBC)?. Wouldn’t it make more sense if we only allow Soft Credit to Household accounts to cascade the credit to an individual? What would be a scenario where it would be needed to Soft Credit an Organization?

    Example:

    All 25 records that needs to be checked.

    Id

    Name

    0038v000001j096AAA

    0014a000007ojYAAAY

    David Webb

    0038v000001j02PAAQ

    0014a000007nkovAAA

    Geoff Hay

    0034a0000086lxyAAA

    0014a000008d8miAAA

    Heidi Thomas

    0038v000001j1U0AAI

    0014a000007ojYAAAY

    Lidia Zin

    0038v000001j9ulAAA

    0014a000007ojYAAAY

    Martin Potter

    0034a000007DbanAAC

    0014a000007nnX4AAI

    Mike Covey

    0034a000007iePvAAI

    0014a000007pA2VAAU

    Sir/ Madam11994

    0034a000007ieCSAAY

    0014a000007nxEdAAI

    Aiden Jacks

    0038v000001j075AAA

    0014a000007ojYAAAY

    Karl Zhao

    0038v000001jACkAAM

    0014a000007nxEdAAI

    Spencer Percival

    0038v000001j2AzAAI

    0014a000007nxEdAAI

    Mathew Gault

    0034a000007ibk0AAA

    0014a000007ph5KAAQ

    Rudolf George Herman Prince

    0038v000001mqYXAAY

    0014a000007ojYAAAY

    Leanne Peacock

    0038v000001j9Q2AAI

    0014a000007omuSAAQ

    Dominic Madrigrano

    0038v000001qjdgAAA

    0014a000007nlXOAAY

    Michelle Finegan

    0038v000001t4ckAAA

    0018v000003zlqaAAA

    Matthew Nacard

    0038v0000016wIjAAI

    0014a000007nxEdAAI

    Renee Dimech

    0034a000007ieuEAAQ

    0014a000007omuSAAQ

    Aine Corrigan

    0034a000007FIk6AAG

    0014a000007pjsTAAQ

    Vanessa Dale

    0034a0000088MnoAAE

    0014a000008eaTnAAI

    Jason Masters

    0034a000007quoUAAQ

    0014a000007pjsTAAQ

    Ben Brown

    0038v000001iztDAAQ

    0014a000007ojYAAAY

    Luke Williams

    0038v000001jAm1AAE

    0014a000007nxEdAAI

    Anton Murphy

    0038v000001j04uAAA

    0014a000007ojYAAAY

    Michael Walker

    0038v000001izdFAAQ

    0014a000007ojYAAAY

    henrletta keech

     

     

    Scenarios:

    Matching gift:
    org that matched the gift should not get "credit"
    the employee who made the gift should get the "credit" for the donation and the matched gift.

    Fundraisers:

    Fundraisers who ask their friends to donate. They are not considered as donor in this case.

    Company Donation:

    Contacts who work for a company and their company donate money. They are not considered as donors.

    Foundations:

    People who give through their foundation and they donate through their fund and use the receipt for tax purposes etc, in such a cases as they are the main decision maker they are considered as donor.

    Estate Accounts: AVE-100

    Estate account primarily consist of a solicitor/executor as primary contact and the deceased contact as the secondary contact.

    if contact has his own household account, we need to decide whether the contact should be directly linked to its household account or not. One contributor in AQ community says : “We create separate Accounts for the Estates, but set up an Account-to-Account Relationship (Coverer/Coveree) so that all gifts made by the Estate (also an Account Record Type of Household) gives automatic soft credit to the person's Account. The tax receipts go to the Estate, but the Donor's giving totals all sum correctly.” - zendesk post link

    Estate being an organization account, by definition should not give legal credits. It can however give soft credit to a household account.

    Peer to Peer Campaign

    Some campaigns are organized by one contact who gets soft credited from gifts coming from this campaign but should not be considered as donor

    This needs a decision on when do we consider soft credit as donor versus not a donor… Example https://sydneyuni-adv--uat.sandbox.lightning.force.com/lightning/r/AQB__Gift__c/a0s8v000000BSPGAA4/view

     

    Clean Up Activities TAP-211

    • Household Contacts with legal credit should be Donors (i found 20 records to investigate/clean)

    • Household Contacts without legal credit

      1. if it has a soft credit it should be donor (i found 3 records to investigate/clean)

      2. else it should NOT be donor (i found 3,757 records to investigate/clean)

    • Organisation Contacts with legal credit

     

    • Corporate Contacts with legal credit should/should not be a Donor? (depending on if we count as Donor or Not, there are about 31 records to review)

    • Corporate Contacts without legal credit

      • If it has soft credit it should NOT be a donor (found 25 records to investigate/clean)

      • if no soft credit, it is NOT a donor (found 266 records to investigate/clean)

     

    Update Contact Type as Donor Flow

    Based on the definition of Donor, the flow that updates the contact type as donor needs to be updated.

    https://sydneyuni-adv--uat.sandbox.lightning.force.com/builder_platform_interaction/flowBuilder.app?flowId=3014a0000000VJrAAM

     

    At the moment, once a gift is created, it will tag the Contact as Donor. @Yeng Sembrano is this correct? Do you agree that we should update the flow to check the conditions as per this document before flagging the contact as donor?

     

    Related content

    1. Business Rules Meetings Minutes
    1. Business Rules Meetings Minutes
    Read with this
    2023-12-08 AQ Consultation Session 11
    2023-12-08 AQ Consultation Session 11
    More like this
    2023-11-22 AQ Consultation Session 6
    2023-11-22 AQ Consultation Session 6
    More like this
    2023-11-13 AQ Consultation Session 3
    2023-11-13 AQ Consultation Session 3
    More like this