...
Statistics at the end of Sprint
...
Cumulative Flow Diagram
...
Retrospective
Conducted using IdeaBoardz to collaborate and gather feedback. Participants were given an opportunity to vote on the feedback for discussion.
What went well? | |
Point | Votes |
Good collaboration between ICT and Advancement on the data/ field mapping. | 1 |
Peoplesoft integration solution | 1 |
Lots of Technical challenges during the build. The team worked together to overcome these with novel solutions | 1 |
Discussion with team helped in making the solution (Salesforce and Peoplesoft integration) simpler | 0 |
clearer direction on architecture for Peoplesoft integration | 0 |
ICT integrations team collaborating effectively with DRS team to resolve integrations issues to deliver MVP. | 3 |
Solution Architect has a quick turnaround of architectural designs and decisions. | 2 |
great dedication of integration developer in completing SITS integration | 1 |
What can be improved? | |
Point | Votes |
Low % completion of user stories | 0 |
Quicker turnaround time with Architecture to ensure build/ test is not held back | 0 |
Identifying the priority and setting the targetSprint Planning needs to take into account capacity and only take on tickets that can be achieved. | 1 |
Team is experiencing Sprint fatigue and needs a motivation boost. | 0 |
solving the data issues at source Trying to solve SITS data quality issue programmatically has made the integration complex. | 0 |
Action items
Action Items | |
Point | Votes |
Identify dependencies with other teams and prioritise for action. | 0 |
